dc.contributor.author
Friend, Toby
dc.date.accessioned
2024-06-25T08:05:20Z
dc.date.available
2024-06-25T08:05:20Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/43947
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-43657
dc.description.abstract
I’ll argue that one particular argument of Nāgārjuna’s against causation in the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā deserves careful consideration from the perspective of contemporary western metaphysics. To show why this is the case, I’ll offer an interpretation of the key passages which differs from at least one popular reading. I’ll then aim to show that a whole swathe of metaphysical views about causation are problematic in light of Nāgārjuna’s argument, so interpreted. I’ll conclude, however, that one contemporary view in metaphysics has the means to respond to this argument: Ontic Structural Realism.
en
dc.format.extent
22 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Ontic Structural Realism
en
dc.subject
Mūlamadhyamakakārikā
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::100 Philosophie::102 Verschiedenes
dc.title
Madhyamaka and Ontic Structural Realism
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
38
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s44204-024-00146-x
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Asian Journal of Philosophy
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-024-00146-x
refubium.affiliation
Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Philosophie
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
2731-4642