dc.contributor.author
Bernbeck, Reinhard
dc.date.accessioned
2013-02-03T09:00:25Z
dc.date.available
2024-02-16T09:00:25Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/42422
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-42146
dc.description.abstract
On a first reading of Dawid Kobiałka’s reflections, I found a lot to agree with. A second reading, however, led me to take a rather different perspective on three grounds: (1) his claims to the global reach of theoretical discourse are mistaken; (2) he adroitly but inappropriately mixes different forms of the “new”; and (3) he tends to dismiss the endeavor of critique as wrongheaded.
en
dc.format.extent
7 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
neue Archäologien
de
dc.subject
Wiederholung
de
dc.subject
new archaeologies
en
dc.subject.ddc
900 Geschichte und Geografie::900 Geschichte::901 Geschichtsphilosophie, Geschichtstheorie
dc.title
In Defense of „the New“: a Response to Dawid Kobiałka
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dc.title.subtitle
Streitraum: Neue Archäologien
dc.title.translated
Zur Verteidigung des "Neuen": eine Antwort auf Dawid Kobiałka
de
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.6105/journal.fka.2013.2.3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Forum Kritische Archäologie
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
23
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
28
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
2 (2023)
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
www.kritischearchaeologie.de
refubium.affiliation
Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2194-346X
