dc.contributor.author
Siewert, Julia
dc.contributor.author
Teut, Michael
dc.contributor.author
Gaertner, K.
dc.contributor.author
Binting, S.
dc.contributor.author
Eberhardt, Cornelia
dc.contributor.author
Ortiz, M.
dc.contributor.author
Grabowska, Weronika
dc.contributor.author
Reinhold, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Roll, Stephanie
dc.contributor.author
Stoeckigt, Barbara
dc.contributor.author
Willich, Stephan N.
dc.contributor.author
Cramer, H.
dc.contributor.author
Brinkhaus, Benno
dc.date.accessioned
2023-11-22T12:34:33Z
dc.date.available
2023-11-22T12:34:33Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/41592
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-41312
dc.description.abstract
Background: Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) frequently use homeopathic therapy. Although there is some evidence that homeopathy may be effective in treating symptoms of SAR, there is a lack of high-quality clinical trials. Therefore, the aim of the homeopathy for SAR (HOMEOSAR) trial is to determine the efficacy of individualized or standardized homeopathic drug treatment compared to placebo regarding rhinitis-related quality of life in patients with SAR.
Methods: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-armed intervention study will be conducted at two university hospital outpatient clinics for complementary and integrative medicine in Berlin and in 12 office-based practices specializing in homeopathic treatment in Germany. A total of 270 patients with clinical symptoms of SAR and positive allergy test to birch and grass pollen will receive homeopathic anamnesis and subsequently be randomized into (a) standardized homeopathic drug treatment with Galphimia Glauca (potency D6), (b) individualized homeopathic drug treatment (D6), or (c) placebo. All three groups can receive on-demand rescue medication as needed. Treatment will consist of two consultations and daily intake of the study medication for 4 weeks during the pollen season. The primary outcome is the mean overall score of the Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in weeks 3 and 4, analyzed using analysis of covariance (adjusted for baseline RQLQ overall score and study center). A closed testing procedure will be used to control the overall type I error comparing the 3 treatment groups. Secondary outcomes include the overall RQLQ and its seven domain scores, responder status (decrease in RQLQ overall score of at least 0.5 points compared to the baseline value), use of rescue medication, intensity of total and individual SAR symptoms based on visual analog scale, generic health-related quality of life, safety, utilization of health care resources and associated costs. In addition, a qualitative data analysis is planned.
Conclusion: The results of our study will contribute to clarifying the possible therapeutic effects of homeopathic drug treatment for patients with SAR.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Complementary and alternative medicine
en
dc.subject
Seasonal allergic rhinitis
en
dc.subject
Randomized controlled trial
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Homeopathy for seasonal allergic rhinitis: rationale, design and methods of the three-armed randomized controlled HOMEOSAR trial
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
338
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s12906-022-03820-w
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
22
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
36550537
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2662-7671