dc.contributor.author
Högner, Anica
dc.contributor.author
Al‐Batran, Salah‐Eddin
dc.contributor.author
Siveke, Jens T.
dc.contributor.author
Lorenz, Mario
dc.contributor.author
Bartels, Prisca
dc.contributor.author
Breithaupt, Kirstin
dc.contributor.author
Malfertheiner, Peter
dc.contributor.author
Homann, Nils
dc.contributor.author
Stein, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Gläser, Dietrich
dc.contributor.author
Tamm, Ingo
dc.contributor.author
Hinke, Axel
dc.contributor.author
Vogel, Arndt
dc.contributor.author
Thuss‐Patience, Peter
dc.contributor.author
PaFLO investigators
dc.date.accessioned
2022-11-28T12:59:09Z
dc.date.available
2022-11-28T12:59:09Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/37044
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-36758
dc.description.abstract
VEGF inhibition in gastric cancer has a proven benefit in the second line setting. Pazopanib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, selectively inhibits VEGFR-1, -2 and -3, c-kit and PDGF-R resulting in inhibition of angiogenesis. This open-label randomized phase II trial (2:1) investigated the efficacy of combining pazopanib with FLO (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin) vs FLO alone (internal control arm) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Eighty-seven patients were randomized and 78 patients were eligible and evaluable (PaFLO arm 51 patients, FLO arm 27 patients). The PFS rate at 6 months (primary endpoint) was 34% in the PaFLO arm vs 30% in the FLO arm. Comparing PaFLO with FLO median PFS was 4.66 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.87-6.46) vs 4.47 months (95% CI 1.79-7.14) (95% CI, hazard ratio [HR] 0.96 (0.60-1.55), P = .882 [exploratory]); median OS was 10.19 months (95% CI 5.46-14.92) vs 7.33 months (95% CI 4.93-9.73), (95% CI HR 1.01 [0.62-1.65], P = .953, exploratory), disease control rate was 72% vs 59%. PaFLO was well tolerable, toxicities were slightly higher in the PaFLO arm. Major adverse events were loss of appetite, nausea, fatigue, diarrhea, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Adding pazopanib to chemotherapy shows signs of efficacy but no major improvement in this randomized phase 2 trial. The PFS at 6 months in both arms was lower than expected from the literature. Biomarkers identifying subgroups who benefit and novel combinations are needed.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01503372.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
gastric cancer
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Pazopanib with 5‐FU and oxaliplatin as first line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: A randomized phase‐II study—The PaFLO trial. A study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie AIO‐STO‐0510
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1002/ijc.33864
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
International Journal of Cancer
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
6
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Wiley
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
1007
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
1017
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
150
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
34741530
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0020-7136
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1097-0215