dc.contributor.author
Stefanovic, Mina
dc.contributor.author
Ehring, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Wittekind, Charlotte E.
dc.contributor.author
Kleim, Birgit
dc.contributor.author
Rohde, Judith
dc.contributor.author
Krüger-Gottschalk, Antje
dc.contributor.author
Knaevelsrud, Christine
dc.contributor.author
Rau, Heinrich
dc.contributor.author
Schäfer, Ingo
dc.contributor.author
Schellong, Julia
dc.date.accessioned
2022-11-14T09:13:53Z
dc.date.available
2022-11-14T09:13:53Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36857
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-36570
dc.description.abstract
Background: Network analysis has gained increasing attention as a new framework to study complex associations between symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A number of studies have been published to investigate symptom networks on different sets of symptoms in different populations, and the findings have been inconsistent.
Objective: We aimed to extend previous research by testing whether differences in PTSD symptom networks can be found in survivors of type I (single event; sudden and unexpected, high levels of acute threat) vs. type II (repeated and/or protracted; anticipated) trauma (with regard to their index trauma).
Method: Participants were trauma-exposed individuals with elevated levels of PTSD symptomatology, most of whom (94%) were undergoing assessment in preparation for PTSD treatment in several treatment centres in Germany and Switzerland (n = 286 with type I and n = 187 with type II trauma). We estimated Bayesian Gaussian graphical models for each trauma group and explored group differences in the symptom network.
Results: First, for both trauma types, our analyses identified the edges that were repeatedly reported in previous network studies. Second, there was decisive evidence that the two networks were generated from different multivariate normal distributions, i.e. the networks differed on a global level. Third, explorative edge-wise comparisons showed moderate or strong evidence for specific 12 edges. Edges which emerged as especially important in distinguishing the networks were between intrusions and flashbacks, highlighting the stronger positive association in the group of type II trauma survivors compared to type I survivors. Flashbacks showed a similar pattern of results in the associations with detachment and sleep problems (type II > type I).
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that trauma type contributes to the heterogeneity in the symptom network. Future research on PTSD symptom networks should include this variable in the analyses to reduce heterogeneity.
en
dc.format.extent
11 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject
network analysis
en
dc.subject
Bayesian graphical Gaussian models
en
dc.subject
network comparison
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::150 Psychologie::150 Psychologie
dc.title
Comparing PTSD symptom networks in type I vs. type II trauma survivors
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
2114260
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1080/20008066.2022.2114260
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
13
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2022.2114260
refubium.affiliation
Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie
refubium.affiliation.other
Arbeitsbereich Klinisch-Psychologische Intervention
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2000-8066
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert