dc.contributor.author
Rüger, Christoph
dc.contributor.author
Feufel, Markus A.
dc.contributor.author
Moosburner, Simon
dc.contributor.author
Özbek, Christopher
dc.contributor.author
Pratschke, Johann
dc.contributor.author
Sauer, Igor M.
dc.date.accessioned
2022-09-09T10:54:20Z
dc.date.available
2022-09-09T10:54:20Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36248
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35964
dc.description.abstract
Purpose: Augmented reality (AR) and head-mounted displays (HMD) in medical practice are current research topics. A commonly proposed use case of AR-HMDs is to display data in image-guided interventions. Although technical feasibility has been thoroughly shown, effects of AR-HMDs on interventions are not yet well researched, hampering clinical applicability. Therefore, the goal of this study is to better understand the benefits and limitations of this technology in ultrasound-guided interventions.
Methods: We used an AR-HMD system (based on the first-generation Microsoft Hololens) which overlays live ultrasound images spatially correctly at the location of the ultrasound transducer. We chose ultrasound-guided needle placements as a representative task for image-guided interventions. To examine the effects of the AR-HMD, we used mixed methods and conducted two studies in a lab setting: (1) In a randomized crossover study, we asked participants to place needles into a training model and evaluated task duration and accuracy with the AR-HMD as compared to the standard procedure without visual overlay and (2) in a qualitative study, we analyzed the user experience with AR-HMD using think-aloud protocols during ultrasound examinations and semi-structured interviews after the task.
Results: Participants (n = 20) placed needles more accurately (mean error of 7.4 mm vs. 4.9 mm, p = 0.022) but not significantly faster (mean task duration of 74.4 s vs. 66.4 s, p = 0.211) with the AR-HMD. All participants in the qualitative study (n = 6) reported limitations of and unfamiliarity with the AR-HMD, yet all but one also clearly noted benefits and/or that they would like to test the technology in practice.
Conclusion: We present additional, though still preliminary, evidence that AR-HMDs provide benefits in image-guided procedures. Our data also contribute insights into potential causes underlying the benefits, such as improved spatial perception. Still, more comprehensive studies are needed to ascertain benefits for clinical applications and to clarify mechanisms underlying these benefits.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Augmented reality
en
dc.subject
Mixed reality
en
dc.subject
Extended reality
en
dc.subject
Head-mounted display
en
dc.subject
Needle placement
en
dc.subject
Image-guided
en
dc.subject
Ultrasound-guided
en
dc.subject
Mixed methods
en
dc.subject
Human factors
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Ultrasound in augmented reality: a mixed-methods evaluation of head-mounted displays in image-guided interventions
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s11548-020-02236-6
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
1895
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
1905
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
15
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32725398
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1861-6410
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1861-6429