dc.contributor.author
Parwani, Abdul Shokor
dc.contributor.author
Lacour, Philipp
dc.contributor.author
Franke, Philip
dc.contributor.author
Reichert, Uwe
dc.contributor.author
Christoph, Klein
dc.contributor.author
Beiert, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Supryn, Rafal
dc.contributor.author
Rangasamy, Karthikeyan
dc.contributor.author
Kull, Tony
dc.contributor.author
Hohendanner, Felix
dc.contributor.author
Heinzel, Frank
dc.contributor.author
Kucher, Andreas
dc.contributor.author
Boldt, Leif‐Hendrik
dc.contributor.author
Pieske, Burkert
dc.contributor.author
Blaschke, Florian
dc.date.accessioned
2022-03-04T13:31:26Z
dc.date.available
2022-03-04T13:31:26Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/34332
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-34049
dc.description.abstract
Background:
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators use low-voltage shock impedance measurements to monitor the lead integrity. However, previous case reports suggest that low-voltage shock impedance measurements may fail to detect insulation breaches that can cause life-threatening electrical short circuits.
Methods and results:
We report six cases of insulation breaches in transvenous defibrillation leads that were not obvious during standard interrogations and testing of the lead beforehand. In two cases, an electrical short circuit during commanded shock delivery for internal electrical cardioversion resulted in a total damage of the ICD generator. In one of these cases, commanded shock delivery induced ventricular fibrillation, which required external defibrillation. In two cases, a shock due to ventricular tachycardia was aborted as the shock impedance was less than 20 Ω. However, in both cases the tiny residual shock energy terminated the ventricular tachycardia. In contrast, in one case the residual energy of the aborted shock did not end ventricular fibrillation induced at defibrillator threshold testing. In one case, the ICD indicated an error code for a short circuit condition detected during an adequate shock delivery.
Conclusions:
This case series illustrates that low-voltage shock impedance measurements can fail to detect insulation breaches. These data suggest that in patients without a contraindication, traditional defibrillator threshold testing or high voltage synchronized shock at the time of device replacement should be considered.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject
electrical short circuit
en
dc.subject
implantable cardioverter defibrillator
en
dc.subject
lead insulation failure
en
dc.subject
shock impedance
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Low‐voltage shock impedance measurements: A false sense of security
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1111/pace.14117
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Wiley
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
93
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
100
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
44
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
33140439
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0147-8389
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1540-8159