dc.contributor.author
Kamphues, Carsten
dc.contributor.author
Andreatos, Nikolaos
dc.contributor.author
Kruppa, Jochen
dc.contributor.author
Buettner, Stefan
dc.contributor.author
Wang, Jaeyun
dc.contributor.author
Sasaki, Kazunari
dc.contributor.author
Wagner, Doris
dc.contributor.author
Morioka, Daisuke
dc.contributor.author
Fitschek, Fabian
dc.contributor.author
Løes, Inger Marie
dc.contributor.author
Imai, Katsunori
dc.contributor.author
Sun, Jinger
dc.contributor.author
Poultsides, George
dc.contributor.author
Kaczirek, Klaus
dc.contributor.author
Lønning, Per Eystein
dc.contributor.author
Endo, Itaru
dc.contributor.author
Baba, Hideo
dc.contributor.author
Kornprat, Peter
dc.contributor.author
Aucejo, Federico N.
dc.contributor.author
Wolfgang, Christopher L.
dc.contributor.author
Kreis, Martin E.
dc.contributor.author
Weiss, Matthew J.
dc.contributor.author
Margonis, Georgios Antonios
dc.date.accessioned
2022-02-22T10:39:53Z
dc.date.available
2022-02-22T10:39:53Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/34095
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-33813
dc.description.abstract
Background and Objectives:
Despite the long-standing consensus on the importance of tumor size, tumor number and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels as predictors of long-term outcomes among patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), optimal prognostic cut-offs for these variables have not been established.
Methods:
Patients who underwent curative-intent resection of CRLM and had available data on at least one of the three variables of interest above were selected from a multi-institutional dataset of patients with known KRAS mutational status. The resulting cohort was randomly split into training and testing datasets and recursive partitioning analysis was employed to determine optimal cut-offs. The concordance probability estimates (CPEs) for these optimal cut offs were calculated and compared to CPEs for the most widely used cut-offs in the surgical literature.
Results:
A total of 1643 patients who met eligibility criteria were identified. Following recursive partitioning analysis in the training dataset, the following cut-offs were identified: 2.95 cm for tumor size, 1.5 for tumor number and 6.15 ng/ml for CEA levels. In the entire dataset, the calculated CPEs for the new tumor size (0.52), tumor number (0.56) and CEA (0.53) cut offs exceeded CPEs for other commonly employed cut-offs.
Conclusion:
The current study was able to identify optimal cut-offs for the three most commonly employed prognostic factors in CRLM. While the per variable gains in discriminatory power are modest, these novel cut-offs may help produce appreciable increases in prognostic performance when combined in the context of future risk scores.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
colorectal cancer
en
dc.subject
prognostic factors
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
The optimal cut‐off values for tumor size, number of lesions, and CEA levels in patients with surgically treated colorectal cancer liver metastases: An international, multi‐institutional study
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1002/jso.26361
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Surgical Oncology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Wiley
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
939
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
948
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
123
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
33400818
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0022-4790
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1096-9098