dc.contributor.author
Szczuka, Zofia
dc.contributor.author
Kulis, Ewa
dc.contributor.author
Boberska, Monika
dc.contributor.author
Banik, Anna
dc.contributor.author
Kruk, Magdalena
dc.contributor.author
Keller, Jan
dc.contributor.author
Knoll, Nina
dc.contributor.author
Scholz, Urte
dc.contributor.author
Abraham, Charles
dc.contributor.author
Luszczynska, Aleksandra
dc.date.accessioned
2021-12-14T08:30:31Z
dc.date.available
2021-12-14T08:30:31Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/33109
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-32832
dc.description.abstract
Rationale
Although effects of individual planning interventions on physical activity (PA) are well established, less is known about the relationships between planning and sedentary behavior (SB).
Objective
This study evaluated the efficacy of individual planning, dyadic planning (i.e., joint planning, targeting the behavior of one person only: the target person), and collaborative planning (i.e., joint planning and joint behavioral performance) on sedentary behavior among dyads.
Methods
Dyads (N = 320 target persons and their partners, aged 18–90 years) were randomized into three PA planning conditions (individual, dyadic, or collaborative) or an active (education) control condition. Main outcomes, i.e., sedentary time, proportion of time spent in SB and light-intensity PA, proportion of time spent in SB and total PA were measured with GT3X-BT accelerometers at baseline, 1-week follow-up, and 36-week follow-up. Two-level models with measurement points nested in participants were fit, separately for target persons and partners.
Results
Findings for target persons obtained at 1-week follow-up indicated that in the collaborative planning condition SB time significantly decreased, compared to the control condition (p = .013). There was an improvement in the proportion of time spent in SB and light-intensity PA (p = .019), and the proportion of time spent in SB and total PA (p = .018), indicating that SB time was displaced by PA. Effects of individual and dyadic planning were not significant, compared to the control condition. None of interventions had a significant effect on SB indices at 36-week follow-up. Regarding dyadic partners, there were no effects of planning interventions at 1-week follow-up or 36-week follow-up, compared to the control condition.
Conclusions
Collaborative planning may prompt a short-term reduction of SB time and result in a shift towards a healthier balance between SB time and PA time among target persons, who did not adhere to PA guidelines at baseline.
en
dc.format.extent
11 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Sedentary behavior
en
dc.subject
Physical activity
en
dc.subject
Randomized controlled trial
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::150 Psychologie::150 Psychologie
dc.title
Can individual, dyadic, or collaborative planning reduce sedentary behavior? A randomized controlled trial
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
114336
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114336
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Social Science & Medicine
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
287
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114336
refubium.affiliation
Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie
refubium.affiliation.other
Arbeitsbereich Gesundheitspsychologie
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1873-5347
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert