dc.contributor.author
Raatz, Larissa
dc.contributor.author
Walzl, Karin Pirhofer
dc.contributor.author
Müller, Marina E. H.
dc.contributor.author
Scherber, Christoph
dc.contributor.author
Joshi, Jasmin
dc.date.accessioned
2021-11-03T12:16:27Z
dc.date.available
2021-11-03T12:16:27Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/32492
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-32217
dc.description.abstract
Semi-natural habitats (SNHs) are becoming increasingly scarce in modern agricultural landscapes. This may reduce natural ecosystem services such as pest control with its putatively positive effect on crop production. In agreement with other studies, we recently reported wheat yield reductions at field borders which were linked to the type of SNH and the distance to the border. In this experimental landscape-wide study, we asked whether these yield losses have a biotic origin while analyzing fungal seed and fungal leaf pathogens, herbivory of cereal leaf beetles, and weed cover as hypothesized mediators between SNHs and yield. We established experimental winter wheat plots of a single variety within conventionally managed wheat fields at fixed distances either to a hedgerow or to an in-field kettle hole. For each plot, we recorded the fungal infection rate on seeds, fungal infection and herbivory rates on leaves, and weed cover. Using several generalized linear mixed-effects models as well as a structural equation model, we tested the effects of SNHs at a field scale (SNH type and distance to SNH) and at a landscape scale (percentage and diversity of SNHs within a 1000-m radius). In the dry year of 2016, we detected one putative biotic culprit: Weed cover was negatively associated with yield values at a 1-m and 5-m distance from the field border with a SNH. None of the fungal and insect pests, however, significantly affected yield, neither solely nor depending on type of or distance to a SNH. However, the pest groups themselves responded differently to SNH at the field scale and at the landscape scale. Our findings highlight that crop losses at field borders may be caused by biotic culprits; however, their negative impact seems weak and is putatively reduced by conventional farming practices.
en
dc.format.extent
15 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
arable weeds
en
dc.subject
cereal leaf beetle
en
dc.subject
fungal pathogens
en
dc.subject
structural equation model
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
dc.title
Who is the culprit: Is pest infestation responsible for crop yield losses close to semi-natural habitats?
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1002/ece3.8046
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Ecology and Evolution
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
19
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
13232
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
13246
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
11
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8046
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Biologie
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2045-7758
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert