dc.contributor.author
Zabotkin, Mikhail
dc.date.accessioned
2021-10-14T07:32:21Z
dc.date.available
2021-10-14T07:32:21Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/32304
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-32029
dc.description.abstract
This paper analyzes the extent to which neo-cleavage theory can explain democratic backsliding in the European Union, focusing on the role of the GAL/TAN cleavage and an alternative explanation, populism. It brings together different factors into a causal model based on the willingness-opportunity metatheoretical framework, which is then evaluated empirically using the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). The results indicate that both TAN ideological stance and populism provide two alternative motivations for democratic backsliding, but do not produce backsliding in the absence of certain opportunities.
en
dc.format.extent
26 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject
Europäische Integration
de
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.title
Neo-cleavage Theory and Democratic Backsliding in the European Union
dc.description.edition
März 2019
dc.identifier.urn
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-refubium-32304-1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://www.polsoz.fu-berlin.de/polwiss/forschung/international/europa/partner-und-online-ressourcen/arbeitspapiere/index.html
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
yes
refubium.series.issueNumber
21
refubium.series.name
Berliner Arbeitspapier zur Europäischen Integration
dcterms.accessRights.dnb
free
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access