dc.contributor.author
Ricciardi, Anthony
dc.contributor.author
Iacarella, Josephine C.
dc.contributor.author
Aldridge, David C.
dc.contributor.author
Blackburn, Tim M.
dc.contributor.author
Carlton, James T.
dc.contributor.author
Catford, Jane A.
dc.contributor.author
Dick, Jaimie T. A.
dc.contributor.author
Hulme, Philip E.
dc.contributor.author
Jeschke, Jonathan M.
dc.contributor.author
Liebhold, Andrew M.
dc.date.accessioned
2021-08-24T07:37:49Z
dc.date.available
2021-08-24T07:37:49Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/31731
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-31462
dc.description.abstract
Unprecedented rates of introduction and spread of non-native species pose burgeoning challenges to biodiversity, natural resource management, regional economies, and human health. Current biosecurity efforts are failing to keep pace with globalization, revealing critical gaps in our understanding and response to invasions. Here, we identify four priority areas to advance invasion science in the face of rapid global environmental change. First, invasion science should strive to develop a more comprehensive framework for predicting how the behavior, abundance, and interspecific interactions of non-native species vary in relation to conditions in receiving environments and how these factors govern the ecological impacts of invasion. A second priority is to understand the potential synergistic effects of multiple co-occurring stressors— particularly involving climate change—on the establishment and impact of non-native species. Climate adaptation and mitigation strategies will need to consider the possible consequences of promoting non-native species, and appropriate management responses to non-native species will need to be developed. The third priority is to address the taxonomic impediment. The ability to detect and evaluate invasion risks is compromised by a growing deficit in taxonomic expertise, which cannot be adequately compensated by new molecular technologies alone. Management of biosecurity risks will become increasingly challenging unless academia, industry, and governments train and employ new personnel in taxonomy and systematics. Fourth, we recommend that internationally cooperative biosecurity strategies consider the bridgehead effects of global dispersal networks, in which organisms tend to invade new regions from locations where they have already established. Cooperation among countries to eradicate or control species established in bridgehead regions should yield greater benefit than independent attempts by individual countries to exclude these species from arriving and establishing.
en
dc.format.extent
23 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
climate change
en
dc.subject
ecological impact
en
dc.subject
invasive species
en
dc.subject
risk assessment
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
dc.title
Four priority areas to advance invasion science in the face of rapid environmental change
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1139/er-2020-0088
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Environmental Reviews
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
119
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
141
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
29
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2020-0088
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Biologie
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1208-6053
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert