dc.contributor.author
Latombe, Guillaume
dc.contributor.author
Richardson, David M.
dc.contributor.author
McGeoch, Melodie A.
dc.contributor.author
Altwegg, Res
dc.contributor.author
Catford, Jane A.
dc.contributor.author
Chase, Jonathan M.
dc.contributor.author
Courchamp, Franck
dc.contributor.author
Esler, Karen J.
dc.contributor.author
Jeschke, Jonathan M.
dc.contributor.author
Landi, Pietro
dc.date.accessioned
2021-04-15T09:51:30Z
dc.date.available
2021-04-15T09:51:30Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/30354
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-30095
dc.description.abstract
Community and invasion ecology have mostly grown independently. There is substantial overlap in the processes captured by different models in the two fields, and various frameworks have been developed to reduce this redundancy and synthesize information content. Despite broad recognition that community and invasion ecology are interconnected, a process-based framework synthesizing models across these two fields is lacking. Here we review 65 representative community and invasion models and propose a common framework articulated around six processes (dispersal, drift, abiotic interactions, within-guild interactions, cross-guild interactions, and genetic changes). The framework is designed to synthesize the content of the two fields, provide a general perspective on their development, and enable their comparison. The application of this framework and of a novel method based on network theory reveals some lack of coherence between the two fields, despite some historical similarities. Community ecology models are characterized by combinations of multiple processes, likely reflecting the search for an overarching theory to explain community assembly and structure, drawing predominantly on interaction processes, but also accounting largely for the other processes. In contrast, most models in invasion ecology invoke fewer processes and focus more on interactions between introduced species and their novel biotic and abiotic environment. The historical dominance of interaction processes and their independent developments in the two fields is also reflected in the lower level of coherence for models involving interactions, compared to models involving dispersal, drift, and genetic changes. It appears that community ecology, with a longer history than invasion ecology, has transitioned from the search for single explanations for patterns observed in nature to investigate how processes may interact mechanistically, thereby generating and testing hypotheses. Our framework paves the way for a similar transition in invasion ecology, to better capture the dynamics of multiple alien species introduced in complex communities. Reciprocally, applying insights from invasion to community ecology will help us understand and predict the future of ecological communities in the Anthropocene, in which human activities are weakening species' natural boundaries. Ultimately, the successful integration of the two fields could advance a predictive ecology that is urgently required in a rapidly changing world.
en
dc.format.extent
23 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
community ecology
en
dc.subject
invasion ecology
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie::577 Ökologie
dc.title
Mechanistic reconciliation of community and invasion ecology
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
e03359
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1002/ecs2.3359
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Ecosphere
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
12
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3359
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Biologie
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2150-8925
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert