dc.contributor.author
Meier, Karien
dc.contributor.author
Glatz, Toivo
dc.contributor.author
Guijt, Mathijs C.
dc.contributor.author
Piccininni, Marco
dc.contributor.author
Meulen, Merel van der
dc.contributor.author
Atmar, Khaled
dc.contributor.author
Jolink, Anne-Tess C.
dc.contributor.author
Kurth, Tobias
dc.contributor.author
Rohmann, Jessica L.
dc.contributor.author
Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H.
dc.contributor.author
COVID-19 Survey Study group
dc.date.accessioned
2020-09-28T05:51:34Z
dc.date.available
2020-09-28T05:51:34Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/28335
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-28085
dc.description.abstract
Background:
The extent to which people implement government-issued protective measures is critical in preventing further spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Our study aimed to describe the public belief in the effectiveness of protective measures, the reported implementation of these measures, and to identify communication channels used to acquire information on COVID-19 in European countries during the early stage of the pandemic.
Methods and findings:
An online survey available in multiple languages was disseminated starting on March 19th, 2020. After five days, we computed descriptive statistics for countries with more than 500 respondents. Each day, we assessed enacted community containment measures by stage of stringency (I-IV). In total, 9,796 adults responded, of whom 8,611 resided in the Netherlands (stage III), 604 in Germany (stage III), and 581 in Italy (stage IV). To explore possible dynamics as containment strategies intensified, we also included 1,365 responses submitted during the following week. Participants indicated support for governmental measures related to avoiding social gatherings, selective closure of public places, and hand hygiene and respiratory measures (range for all measures: 95.0%-99.7%). Respondents from the Netherlands less frequently considered a complete social lockdown effective (59.2%), compared to respondents in Germany (76.6%) or Italy (87.2%). Italian residents applied enforced social distancing measures more frequently (range: 90.2%-99.3%, German and Dutch residents: 67.5%-97.0%) and self-initiated hygienic and social distancing behaviors (range: 36.3%-96.6%, German and Dutch residents: 28.3%-95.7%). Respondents reported being sufficiently informed about the outbreak and behaviors to avoid infection (range: 90.2%-91.1%). Information channels most commonly reported included television newspapers, official health websites, and social media. One week later, we observed no major differences in submitted responses.
Conclusions:
During the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, belief in the effectiveness of protective measures among survey respondents from three European countries was high and participants reported feeling sufficiently informed. In March 2020, implementation of measures differed between countries and were highest among respondents from Italy, who were subjected to the most stringent lockdown measures and greatest COVID-19 burden in Europe during this period.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Betacoronavirus
en
dc.subject
Coronavirus Infections
en
dc.subject
Hand Disinfection
en
dc.subject
Pneumonia, Viral
en
dc.subject
Public Opinion
en
dc.subject
Social Behavior
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Public perspectives on protective measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, Germany and Italy: A survey study
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
e0236917
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pone.0236917
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
PLOS ONE
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
15
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32756573
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1932-6203