dc.contributor.author
Kresoja, Karl-Patrik
dc.contributor.author
Faragli, Alessandro
dc.contributor.author
Abawi, Dawud
dc.contributor.author
Paul, Oliver
dc.contributor.author
Pieske, Burkert
dc.contributor.author
Post, Heiner
dc.contributor.author
Alogna, Allesio
dc.date.accessioned
2020-04-06T08:57:55Z
dc.date.available
2020-04-06T08:57:55Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/27065
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-26826
dc.description.abstract
AIMS:
Patients referred to the cath-lab are an increasingly elderly population. Thermodilution (TD, gold standard) and the estimated Fick method (eFM) are interchangeably used in the clinical routine to measure cardiac output (CO). However, their correlation in an elderly cohort of cardiac patients has not been tested so far.
METHODS:
A single, clinically-indicated right heart catheterization was performed on each patient with CO estimated by eFM and TD in 155 consecutive patients (75.1±6.8 years, 57.7% male) between April 2015 and August 2017. Whole Body Oxygen Consumption (VO2) was assumed by applying the formulas of LaFarge (LaF), Dehmer (De) and Bergstra (Be). CO was indexed to body surface area (Cardiac Index, CI).
RESULTS:
CI-TD showed an overall moderate correlation to CI-eFM as assessed by LaF, De or Be (r2 = 0.53, r2 = 0.54, r2 = 0.57, all p < .001, respectively) with large limits of agreement (-0.64 to 1.09, -1.07 to 0.77, -1.38 to 0.53 l/m2/min, respectively). The mean difference of CI between methods was 0.22, -0.15 and -0.42 (all p<0.001 for difference to TD), respectively. A rate of error ≥20% occurred with the equations by LaF, De or Be in 40.6%, 26.5% and 36.1% of patients, respectively. A CI <2.2 l/m2min was present in 42.6% of patients according to TD and in 60.0%, 31.0% and in 16.1% of patients according to eFM by the formulas of LaF, De or Be.
CONCLUSION:
Although CI-eFM shows an overall reasonable correlation with CI-TD, the predictive value in a single patient is low. CI-eFM cannot replace CI-TD in elderly patients.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Thermodilution (TD, gold standard)
en
dc.subject
estimated Fick method (eFM)
en
dc.subject
cardiac output (CO)
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Thermodilution vs estimated Fick cardiac output measurement in an elderly cohort of patients: A single-centre experience
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
e0226561
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pone.0226561
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
PLoS ONE
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
12
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
14
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
31860679
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1932-6203