dc.contributor.author
Raatz, Larissa
dc.contributor.author
Bacchi, Nina
dc.contributor.author
Pirhofer Walzl, Karin
dc.contributor.author
Glemnitz, Michael
dc.contributor.author
Müller, Marina E. H.
dc.contributor.author
Joshi, Jasmin
dc.contributor.author
Scherber, Christoph
dc.date.accessioned
2019-08-14T13:07:39Z
dc.date.available
2019-08-14T13:07:39Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/25291
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-3994
dc.description.abstract
Natural landscape elements (NLEs) in agricultural landscapes contribute to biodiversity and ecosystem services, but are also regarded as an obstacle for large‐scale agricultural production. However, the effects of NLEs on crop yield have rarely been measured. Here, we investigated how different bordering structures, such as agricultural roads, field‐to‐field borders, forests, hedgerows, and kettle holes, influence agricultural yields. We hypothesized that (a) yield values at field borders differ from mid‐field yields and that (b) the extent of this change in yields depends on the bordering structure.
We measured winter wheat yields along transects with log‐scaled distances from the border into the agricultural field within two intensively managed agricultural landscapes in Germany (2014 near Göttingen, and 2015–2017 in the Uckermark).
We observed a yield loss adjacent to every investigated bordering structure of 11%–38% in comparison with mid‐field yields. However, depending on the bordering structure, this yield loss disappeared at different distances. While the proximity of kettle holes did not affect yields more than neighboring agricultural fields, woody landscape elements had strong effects on winter wheat yields. Notably, 95% of mid‐field yields could already be reached at a distance of 11.3 m from a kettle hole and at a distance of 17.8 m from hedgerows as well as forest borders.
Our findings suggest that yield losses are especially relevant directly adjacent to woody landscape elements, but not adjacent to in‐field water bodies. This highlights the potential to simultaneously counteract yield losses close to the field border and enhance biodiversity by combining different NLEs in agricultural landscapes such as creating strips of extensive grassland vegetation between woody landscape elements and agricultural fields. In conclusion, our results can be used to quantify ecocompensations to find optimal solutions for the delivery of productive and regulative ecosystem services in heterogeneous agricultural landscapes.
en
dc.format.extent
11 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
crop production
en
dc.subject
ecosystem services
en
dc.subject
land sharing vs. land sparing
en
dc.subject
natural habitats
en
dc.subject
winter wheat
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::630 Landwirtschaft::630 Landwirtschaft und verwandte Bereiche
dc.title
How much do we really lose?—Yield losses in the proximity of natural landscape elements in agricultural landscapes
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1002/ece3.5370
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Ecology and Evolution
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
13
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
7838
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
7848
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
9
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5370
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Biologie / Arbeitsbereich Botanik
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2045-7758
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert