dc.contributor.author
Zschaeck, Sebastian
dc.contributor.author
Wust, Peter
dc.contributor.author
Graf, Reinhold
dc.contributor.author
Misch, Martin
dc.contributor.author
Onken, Julia
dc.contributor.author
Ghadjar, Pirus
dc.contributor.author
Badakhshi, Harun
dc.contributor.author
Florange, Julian
dc.contributor.author
Budach, Volker
dc.contributor.author
Kaul, David
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-27T12:53:33Z
dc.date.available
2019-03-27T12:53:33Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/24202
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-1974
dc.description.abstract
Background: The dismal overall survival (OS) prognosis of glioblastoma, even after trimodal therapy, can be attributed mainly to the frequent incidence of intracranial relapse (ICR), which tends to present as an in-field recurrence after a radiation dose of 60 Gray (Gy). In this study, molecular marker-based prognostic indices were used to compare the outcomes of radiation with a standard dose versus a moderate dose escalation. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 156 patients treated between 2009 and 2016. All patients were medically fit for postoperative chemoradiotherapy. In the dose-escalation cohort a simultaneous integrated boost of up to 66Gy (66Gy RT) within small high-risk volumes was applied. All other patients received daily radiation to a total dose of 60Gy or twice daily to a total dose of 59.2Gy (60Gy RT). Results: A total of 133 patients received standard 60Gy RT, while 23 received 66Gy RT. Patients in the 66Gy RT group were younger (p<0.001), whereas concomitant temozolomide use was more frequent in the 60Gy RT group (p<0.001). Other intergroup differences in known prognostic factors were not observed. Notably, the median time to ICR was significantly prolonged in the 66Gy RT arm versus the 60Gy RT arm (12.2 versus 7.6months, p=0.011), and this translated to an improved OS (18.8 versus 15.3months, p=0.012). A multivariate analysis revealed a strong association of 66Gy RT with a prolonged time to ICR (hazard ratio=0.498, p=0.01) and OS (hazard ratio=0.451, p=0.01). These differences remained significant after implementing molecular marker-based prognostic scores (ICR p=0.008, OS p=0.007) and propensity-scored matched pairing (ICR p=0.099, OS p=0.023). Conclusion: Radiation dose escalation was found to correlate with an improved time to ICR and OS in this cohort of glioblastoma patients. However, further prospective validation of these results is warranted.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Glioblastoma
en
dc.subject
Radiotherapy
en
dc.subject
Temozolomide
en
dc.subject
Dose escalation
en
dc.subject
Simultaneous integrated boost
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Locally dose-escalated radiotherapy may improve intracranial local control and overall survival among patients with glioblastoma
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
251
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s13014-018-1194-8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Radiation Oncology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
BMC
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
13
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
30567592
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1748-717X