dc.contributor.author
Clarkson, Stephen
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T08:11:02Z
dc.date.available
2016-05-27T09:09:30.105Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19504
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-23153
dc.description.abstract
Of all the countries identified as rising powers on the world stage, Brazil
appears to have drawn considerable economic and political strength from its
engagement with various forms of regionalism during the expansionist years
when Lula was president. Whether by helping create a local, intra-regional
entity (Mercosul) or, later, proposing a continental one (UNASUL), Brasilia
appeared to have the capacity to further its own economic and political
interests by generating cooperative interactions with its smaller neighbors.
Subsequently it took a leading role in inter-regional negotiations between
Mercosul and the European Union in the global North and between Mercosul and
ASEAN in the global South. More recently still, it spread its wings by
associating trans-regionally with powers that are similarly dominant within
their own regions – IBSA (India, Brazil, and South Africa) and BRICS (Russia,
India, China, and South Africa) which shared with it a desire to play greater
roles in the major institutions of global governance. While these new
associations have their inner raisons d’être, belonging to them also bolsters
Brazil’s weight in such traditional multilateral organizations as the United
Nations and the WTO which were previously dominated by the US-Europe-Japan
triad. This working paper assesses the relative importance of these different
regionalisms in Brazil’s emergence on the global stage by counterposing them
with such standard explanations of a state’s global significance as its
military might, economic strength, and its soft-power influence overseas. We
identify how various regionalisms interact with traditional bilateral and
multilateral relations in helping or hindering Brazil in its global ascent. We
conclude to our surprise that regionalism has only played a minimally positive
role economically. Even politically, it has on occasion become more hindrance
than help in boosting Brazil into its current orbit – as its announced
intention to negotiate separately with the EU suggests.
en
dc.format.extent
39 Seiten
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000055-9
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.title
Primary or Secondary?
dc.title.subtitle
Regionalism’s Multiple Roles in Brazil’s International Emergence
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000024607
refubium.series.issueNumber
69
refubium.series.name
KFG working paper
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000006459
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1868-760