dc.contributor.author
Herrfahrdt-Pähle, Elke
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T08:01:02Z
dc.date.available
2010-11-11
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19188
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-22853
dc.description.abstract
Changes in the ecological system, such as climate change, and changes in the
social system, such as political and economic transformation processes, put
water governance regimes under pressure. These regimes must either have at
their disposal the needed resilience to cope with these changes and adapt or
face the need to transform into another regime configuration which is better
suited to cope with these changes. These options entail different levels of
institutional continuity and change. Three types of balances between
institutional continuity and change in social-ecological systems are
elaborated: persistence, adaptive change and transformative change. This paper
addresses the challenge of water sector institutions to provide for continuity
on the one hand while meeting the need to change and adapt to new
circumstances (such as climate change or political and economic
transformation) on the other hand. Uzbekistan, which has accumulated intense
pressure for change both in the social and the ecological system, serves as a
case study. Highly unsustainable use of water resources and cotton monoculture
put high pressure on the ecological system. One of the consequences, the
desiccation of the Aral Sea, has major negative repercussions in the social
system (increasing unemployment and decreasing health status of the
population). Since the breakdown of the Soviet Union political and economic
reforms have taken place rather reluctantly and have not triggered
comprehensive changes in the water governance regime. Minor changes have been
introduced at the local level, but the system has not yet departed from its
unsustainable path of development. The paper concludes that the Uzbek water
sector is rather resistant to change and comprises only a low level of
institutional resilience. By applying the concepts of adaptive cycles and
panarchy to institutions and water governance reform processes in Uzbekistan
some drivers of these processes are identified.
de
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000089-6
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften
dc.title
Institutional resilience in water governance reforms
dc.type
Konferenzveröffentlichung
dc.title.subtitle
the case of Uzbekistan
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft / Forschungszentrum für Umweltpolitik (FFU)
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000006956
refubium.note.author
B7: Capacities for Adaptation
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.series.name
Berlin Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000001333
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access