dc.contributor.author
Ellis, Elisabeth
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T07:57:57Z
dc.date.available
2010-11-11
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19083
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-22754
dc.description.abstract
I argue that the current extinction crisis offers profound and unprecedented
challenges to democratic theory. Other environmental problems, such as climate
change, are fundamentally collective action problems of a familiar type. By
contrast, the case of extinction has several unique implications for
democratic theory. First, for fragile species whose medium term preservation
is technically possible, democratic policy flux over time effectively reduces
the scope of policy choice to one—extinction. This is the case because the
normal policy flux that follows from alternation in power will drive a ratchet
effect in which each win for the development side is permanent, while each win
for the preservation side is temporary. Second, uncertainty about the value of
endangered species, even considered from the point of view of the narrowest
market-driven utilitarianism, calls into question the democratic legitimacy of
policies allowing potentially essential species to go extinct. Such policies
reduce the scope of future democratic decision-making irreversibly. This
presents a paradox for democratic theory, since decisions that do not
undermine democracy itself should always in principle be available for
democratic decisionmaking. Third, beyond questions of democratic scope, the
on-the-ground rulemaking processes in the case of species preservation policy
exhibit possibly unique rhetorics of collective incapacity that undermine
political agency at nearly every stage of decision. Fourth and finally,
extinctions, even technically preventable extinctions, present a possible
limit case to democratic politics: democratic polities find themselves
constitutionally unable to achieve the policies that democratic theory
suggests they should consider. Methodological note: this is a work of
political theory, but it is based on both philosophical and empirical
research. As part of my current book project, I am conducting case studies and
a general survey of habitat conservation plans (HCPs) in the United States, to
determine how these democratic dynamics are exhibited in practice.
de
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000089-6
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.title
Extinction and Democracy
dc.type
Konferenzveröffentlichung
dc.title.translated
The extinction crisis and democratic theory
de
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft / Forschungszentrum für Umweltpolitik (FFU)
![No reasonable confidence value was returned from the authority](/cache_202e45ad85b55efaeb29160f63cd3f3b/themes/FuCD/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000006945
refubium.note.author
D1: Participation and Trust
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.series.name
Berlin Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000001327
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access