dc.contributor.author
Soderman, Tarja
dc.contributor.author
Saarela, Sanna-Riikka
dc.contributor.author
Turnpenny, John
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T07:36:09Z
dc.date.available
2013-03-08T14:43:25.322Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18310
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-22017
dc.description.abstract
The swift rise of policy appraisal in recent years – to the status of legal
requirement in many countries - has been mirrored by development of many
support tools such as environmental models. However, there is a widely-
observed gap between extensive supply of such tools, and patchy demand for
them; their use is influenced by many technical, procedural, conceptual and
political factors. How and to what extent can the relationship between
appraisal tools and policy-making be developed, particularly the type of
expertise required for addressing complex policy problems such as climate
change? This paper addresses this question within the wider concept of
science-policy interaction as a fluid and porous interface, and also as a
shared, multi-actor process of addressing policy problems. The paper employs a
knowledge-brokerage (KB) approach, where the linear model of ‘speaking truth
to power’ is challenged by a more reflexive approach to the interaction. To do
this, and to reflect the many context-specific forms of the science-policy
interface, we focus on case studies of six different policy problems at
different decision making levels and jurisdictions. We assess the most
appropriate KB strategy in each case, and critically evaluate the KB approach
– how it worked, what factors influenced it and how effective it was. Using
the preliminary case study results, we describe a preliminary typology for
different 'modes' of SPI operation, and discuss how institutional setting
affects the process, governance and success of knowledge brokerage. Work is
ongoing, but initial results show that the 'test case' concept acts as a
flexible conceptual and practical guidance for researchers in science policy
interactions in policy appraisal processes, and can help facilitate the
relationship between scientists and policy makers. The approach yields
conceptual learning about the science-policy interface, and reveals different
actors' conceptual models of knowledge production and application.
de
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000168-9
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::350 Öffentliche Verwaltung, Militärwissenschaft::354 Verwaltung von Wirtschaft und Umwelt
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.title
Knowledge Brokerage at the Science-Policy Interface: case studies of tools and
policy impact assessment
dc.type
Konferenzveröffentlichung
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft / Forschungszentrum für Umweltpolitik (FFU)
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000016868
refubium.note.author
DRAFT, PLEASE DO NOT CITE!
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.series.name
Berlin Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000002402
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access