dc.contributor.author
De Bruyne, Charlotte
dc.contributor.author
Fischhendler, Itay
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T07:30:00Z
dc.date.available
2010-11-11
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18088
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-21800
dc.description.abstract
Transboundary river basins are of immense economic and environmental
importance but their management constitutes a vexing international problem.
While supply is constant, human activity and changing environmental conditions
lead to the decline of global water availability. Scarcity and changes in
resource availability are likely to spur conflict between partners to a shared
system. Therefore, international institutions and agreements, able to adapt to
changing circumstances will prove to be essential. Regarding the flexibility
of international water agreements, mechanisms to address conflict (CRM) have
already been defined as particularly important. But despite the fact that a
better understanding of CRM-use could provide key insights about costs and
benefits, their appearance in international agreements or the conditions that
provoke their choice have not been systematically examined. This study
analyzes the content of a large number of water agreements and examines which
mechanisms are adopted under what conditions. First, we distinguished 4 types
of conflict resolution (“negotiation”, “mediation”, “arbitration” and
“adjudication”) and identify potential barriers to their adoption. Next, we
selected explanatory variables that potentially affect the choice of CRM and
carried out a multivariate regression to determine which of them were
significant. Our results indicate that, although conflict resolution is
considered important, still 45 per cent of the sampled treaties lack such
provision. Multilateral agreements, however, are more likely to contain CRM.
Most agreements do not specify the activation procedure of the mechanism or
how to bear the cost of its use. Through this research we aim to gain insight
in the diversity of conflict resolution mechanisms available, while acquiring
more knowledge of the circumstances in which they are adopted. Ultimately,
this study can offer policy makers a guide for negotiating environmental
agreements.
de
dc.relation.ispartofseries
urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsseries000000000089-6
dc.rights.uri
http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/refubium/rechtliches/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::320 Politikwissenschaft
dc.title
Governance mechanisms to address conflict in environmental agreements
dc.type
Konferenzveröffentlichung
dc.title.subtitle
the case of transboundary water treaties
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft / Forschungszentrum für Umweltpolitik (FFU)
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000006968
refubium.note.author
E1: Effects of Transboundary Regimes
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.series.name
Berlin Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000001347
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access