dc.contributor.author
Rieger, Georg W.
dc.contributor.author
Heiner, Cynthia Ellen
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T03:56:06Z
dc.date.available
2014-05-22
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/16252
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-20436
dc.description.abstract
We used surveys and classroom observations to examine student reactions to
two-stage exams, where students-first do the exam individually and then redo
it collaboratively. Our results show why both students and instructors
appreciate this examination format: Two-stage collaborative examinations are
relatively easy to implement, have a high potential for learning, and support
the collaborative learning approach used in many sciences classes. A look at
survey data from an introductory physics class shows that a vast majority o f
students (76%) had a positive opinion o f this exam format (expressed in 236
comments) whereas only 10% expressed an overall negative opinion in 30
negative statements. Most o f the positive comments relate to how this
benefits learning. In this article, we describe how to implement two-stage
exams, discuss advantages and disadvantages, and present the students ’ view.
de
dc.rights.uri
http://www.nsta.org/publications/permissions.aspx
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::530 Physik
dc.title
Examinations That Support Collaborative Learning
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
Journal of College Science Teaching. - 43 (2014), 4, S.41-47
dc.identifier.sepid
35474
dc.title.subtitle
The Students’ Perspective
refubium.affiliation
Physik
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Didaktik der Physik
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000020399
refubium.note.author
Erlaubnis des Verlages vorh.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000003604
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0047-231X