dc.contributor.author
Wieler, Lothar H.
dc.contributor.author
Semmler, Torsten
dc.contributor.author
Eichhorn, Inga
dc.contributor.author
Antão, Esther-Maria
dc.contributor.author
Kinnemann, Bianca
dc.contributor.author
Geue, Lutz
dc.contributor.author
Karch, Helge
dc.contributor.author
Günther, Sebastian
dc.contributor.author
Bethe, Astrid
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-08T03:08:33Z
dc.date.available
2013-04-05T13:38:36.150Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/14569
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-18761
dc.description.abstract
Background: Ruminants, in particular bovines, are the primary reservoir of
Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), but whole genome analyses of the current
German ESBL-producing O104:H4 outbreak strain of sequence type (ST) 678 showed
this strain to be highly similar to enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC). Strains
of the EAEC pathotype are basically adapted to the human host. To clarify
whether in contrast to this paradigm, the O104:H4 outbreak strain and/or EAEC
may also be able to colonize ruminants, we screened a total of 2.000 colonies
from faecal samples of 100 cattle from 34 different farms - all located in the
HUS outbreak region of Northern Germany - for genes associated with the
O104:H4 HUS outbreak strain (stx2, terD, rfbO104, fliCH4), STEC (stx1, stx2,
escV), EAEC (pAA, aggR, astA), and ESBL-production (blaCTX-M, blaTEM, blaSHV).
Results: The faecal samples contained neither the HUS outbreak strain nor any
EAEC. As the current outbreak strain belongs to ST678 and displays an en-
teroaggregative and ESBL-producing phenotype, we additionally screened
selected strains for ST678 as well as the aggregative adhesion pattern in
HEp-2 cells. However, we were unable to find any strains belonging to ST678 or
showing an aggregative adhesion pattern. A high percentage of animals (28%)
shed STEC, corroborating previous knowl-edge and thereby proving the validity
of our study. One of the STEC also harboured the LEE pathogenicity island. In
addition, eleven animals shed ESBL-producing E. coli. Conclusions: While we
are aware of the limitations of our survey, our data support the theory, that,
in contrast to other Shiga-toxin producing E. coli, cattle are not the
reservoir for the O104:H4 outbreak strain or other EAEC, but that the outbreak
strain seems to be adapted to humans or might have yet another reservoir,
raising new questions about the epidemiology of STEC O104:H4.
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
dc.subject
enteroaggregative
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::630 Landwirtschaft::636 Viehwirtschaft
dc.title
No evidence of the Shiga toxin-producing E. coli O104:H4 outbreak strain or
enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) found in cattle faeces in northern Germany,
the hotspot of the 2011 HUS outbreak area
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation
Gut Pathogens 3 (2011), 17
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/1757-4749-3-17
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
http://doi.org/10.1186/1757-4749-3-17
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
de
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Mikrobiologie und Tierseuchen
refubium.mycore.fudocsId
FUDOCS_document_000000017270
refubium.note.author
Der Artikel wurde in einer Open-Access-Zeitschrift publiziert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
refubium.mycore.derivateId
FUDOCS_derivate_000000002484
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1757-4749