<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Berlin Conference on Global Environmental Change 2016</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17719</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 18:29:40 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-05-01T18:29:40Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>A Financing Strategy for Community Based Climate Resilient Development</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18000</link>
<description>A Financing Strategy for Community Based Climate Resilient Development
Sabine, Preuss; Unni, Krishnan; Divakaran, Nair
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18000</guid>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Learning Experience</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19480</link>
<description>A Learning Experience
Mersmann, Florian; Reich, Hendrikje
A major cornerstone on the way to low-carbon sustainable development on a&#13;
global scale will be a swift and effective implementation of all countries'&#13;
INDCs submitted to the UNFCCC prior to Paris. However, doing so will require&#13;
transforming development pathways away from currently pervasive carbon lock-&#13;
ins. This can only be successful if countries take a systemic view on their&#13;
development agendas, and link mitigation, adaptation and other developmental&#13;
priorities together for a coherent overarching sustainable development&#13;
strategy. The ownership for this process needs to be with the countries&#13;
themselves as such strategies touch fundamentally upon national policy-making&#13;
and implementation. At the same time, developing countries have access to bi-&#13;
and multilateral financial and technical cooperation. To enable a systemic,&#13;
country-led perspective, development cooperation needs to shift its paradigms&#13;
away from currently prevalent project-level interventions. A truly innovative&#13;
and transformational shift with the objective of pursuing a low-carbon and&#13;
climate resilient society needs to open up space for experimentation as new&#13;
ways of doing things need to be put into practice. Experiments will not always&#13;
be successful, but foster learning on a national as well as an international&#13;
level on pitfalls and solutions in new approaches to low-carbon sustainable&#13;
development. Not least, there needs to be a renewed focus on programmatic&#13;
approaches that link various topical domains for a country-led process, and a&#13;
critical look at development work that is "doomed to succeed". Our article&#13;
draws from systems theory, development studies and recent work on transitions&#13;
studies and transformational change in the international domain. It links up&#13;
different theoretical concepts with practical approaches in order to outline a&#13;
future development agenda that will be owned by developing countries and&#13;
supported non-invasively by bi- and multilateral development cooperation to&#13;
foster low-carbon development pathways that are urgently needed to solve the&#13;
climate crisis.
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19480</guid>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Accountability in Climate change governance and Caribbean SIDS</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18906</link>
<description>Accountability in Climate change governance and Caribbean SIDS
Scobie, Michelle
Accountability is part of the good governance of institutions and regimes. The&#13;
subject of this paper is nature of accountability in the climate change&#13;
governance relationships. Context matters for understanding related governance&#13;
dynamics and this paper presents the findings of research on accountability in&#13;
climate governance in Caribbean SIDS over the last 18 years. It identified the&#13;
Caribbean climate governance agents at the regional and local scales. It&#13;
created an accountability framework that examined two levels&#13;
(internal/external accountability); four accountability relationships&#13;
(normative, relational, decision and behavioural) and four accountability&#13;
mechanisms or processes: certification, monitoring, participation by&#13;
stakeholders in the overseeing of projects and self-reporting. It analysed how&#13;
far accountability was appreciated and applied within institutions and in&#13;
relationships between regional institutions, international partners,&#13;
government agencies, non-governmental organisations and the private sector to&#13;
manage climate change adaptation and mitigation. The study found that&#13;
accountability was valued as a good governance principle but the mechanisms to&#13;
operationalise accountability were lacking in practice. The absence of&#13;
structured processes was attributed to the economic and governance contexts of&#13;
these SIDS. Governance actors had limited resources for governance safeguards.&#13;
The study recommends processes to strengthen the “culture of governance”&#13;
within the Caribbean as a whole and specifically within state agencies and&#13;
civil society.
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18906</guid>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Aligning Sub-national Climate Actions for the new post-Paris Climate Regime</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19043</link>
<description>Aligning Sub-national Climate Actions for the new post-Paris Climate Regime
Hsu, Angel; Weinfurter, Amy J.; Kaiyang, Xu; Wnuck, Stefanie
The rise of sub-national actors in global climate governance underscores the&#13;
need for clear alignment between these efforts and their national&#13;
counterparts. As these sub-national climate actions are filling gaps in&#13;
mitigation, adaptation, and financing, among other functions, a critical&#13;
question is how these efforts complement or overlap with national climate&#13;
pledges. This consideration is particularly important in the context of the&#13;
Paris Agreement’s mandate for fiveyear review cycles, where national&#13;
governments will be asked to demonstrate progress towards climate mitigation&#13;
goals and increase their ambition. In this paper, we argue that alignment –&#13;
both vertically between multiple jurisdictions and horizontally with external&#13;
networks and actors – is critical to clarifying climate actions between&#13;
multiple levels of actors and to maximizing mitigation potential. We use nine&#13;
case studies to demonstrate the varying degrees and modes of vertical&#13;
integration between subnational and national climate actors. We find that the&#13;
case studies embody different styles of vertical alignment, and exhibit&#13;
significant variation in the degree and direction of vertical alignment within&#13;
each of these modes. We also find that many case studies rely on horizontally-&#13;
aligned international networks and coalitions to fill gaps in financial&#13;
resources or technical support. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate that an&#13;
additional 1 gigaton carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) in 2020 can be achieved&#13;
in these nine case studies through stronger alignment that makes it possible&#13;
to scale sub-national climate actions to the national level. These findings&#13;
suggest there may be a missed opportunity to realize greater mitigation&#13;
potential by fostering stronger vertical alignment, and enhancing coordination&#13;
between horizontal networks of climate action and national governments.
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19043</guid>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
