dc.contributor.author
Reinhard, Lisa
dc.contributor.author
Mogl, Martina T.
dc.contributor.author
Benz, Fabian
dc.contributor.author
Dukaczewska, Agata
dc.contributor.author
Butz, Frederike
dc.contributor.author
Dobrindt, Eva Maria
dc.contributor.author
Tacke, Frank
dc.contributor.author
Pratschke, Johann
dc.contributor.author
Goretzki, Peter E.
dc.contributor.author
Jann, Henning
dc.date.accessioned
2025-11-13T16:34:06Z
dc.date.available
2025-11-13T16:34:06Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/50339
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-50065
dc.description.abstract
Purpose
Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine (si-NET) describe a heterogenous group of neoplasms. Based on the Ki67 proliferation index si-NET are divided into G1 (Ki67 < 2%), G2 (Ki67 3–20%) and rarely G3 (Ki67 > 20%) tumors. However, few studies evaluate the impact of tumor grading on prognosis in si-NET. Moreover, si-NET can form distinct lymphatic spread patterns to the mesenteric root, aortocaval lymph nodes, and distant organs. This study aims to identify prognostic factors within the lymphatic spread patterns and grading.
Methods
Demographic, pathological, and surgical data of 208 (90 male, 118 female) individuals with si-NETs treated at Charité University Medicine Berlin between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed retrospectively.
Results
A total of 113 (54.5%) specimens were defined as G1 and 93 (44.7%) as G2 tumors. Interestingly, splitting the G2 group in two subgroups: G2 low (Ki67 3–9%) and G2 high (Ki67 10–20%), displayed significant differences in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.008) and progression free survival (PFS) (p = 0.004) between these subgroups. Remission after surgery was less often achieved in patients with higher Ki67 index (> 10%). Lymph node metastases (N +) were present in 174 (83.6%) patients. Patients with isolated locoregional disease showed better PFS and OS in comparison to patients with additional aortocaval and distant lymph node metastases.
Conclusion
Lymphatic spread pattern influences patient outcome. In G2 tumors, low and high grading shows heterogenous outcome in OS and PFS. Differentiation within this group might impact follow-up, adjuvant treatment, and surgical strategy.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
lymph node metastases
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
237
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00423-023-02956-8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
408
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
37332044
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1435-2451