dc.contributor.author
Kumar, Lohith
dc.contributor.author
Ruland, Florian
dc.contributor.author
Jeschke, Jonathan M.
dc.date.accessioned
2025-11-10T08:18:17Z
dc.date.available
2025-11-10T08:18:17Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/50243
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-49969
dc.description.abstract
India has experienced the introduction of numerous non-native fish species (NNF), some of which have caused ecological and economic impacts. This systematic review provides a currently lacking overview of NNF research in India, potential biases, available evidence, and knowledge gaps. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, we identified a total of 332 records, documenting the presence of 58 NNF distributed across 17 basins, and 19 translocated species in India. The Ganga was the most studied basin (113 studies), followed by the West Flowing Rivers Tadri to Kanyakumari basin (37 studies), however, with 30 NNF reported from each of these basins. We demonstrate how these results can be due to saturated sampling in the Ganga and identify which basins might be currently understudied. We also illustrate how extreme floods precipitated an increase in NNF into rivers and lakes from confinement in the West Flowing Rivers Tadri to Kanyakumari basin. The common carp, Cyprinus carpio, was the most frequently reported NNF (160 times), while Mozambique tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus, was the most widely distributed NNF (13 basins). We found there is a growing number of publications in the field, but that up to 40% of studies have appeared in potentially predatory journals. A minority of studies (44%) investigated NNF impacts, most of which used data from the literature (58%) and reported only qualitative impacts (69%). Most documented impacts were ecological (79%), while some were socio-economic (11%) or both (10%). Only 18% of the studies addressed NNF management. The knowledge synthesized and the gaps identified in this study might serve as a basis for future studies and be useful for efficiently allocating limited resources for investigating NNF in India.
en
dc.format.extent
22 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
freshwater ecosystems
en
dc.subject
invader impacts
en
dc.subject
invasive alien fishes
en
dc.subject
management of invasive alien species
en
dc.subject
spatial distributions
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
dc.title
Non-native freshwater fishes in India: existing evidence and knowledge gaps
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3897/neobiota.102.146421
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
NeoBiota
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
419
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
440
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
102
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.102.146421
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Biologie

refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1314-2488
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert