<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LIAISE Policy Brief</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17604</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 18:48:18 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T18:48:18Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>National-level Policy Strategies</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18682</link>
<description>National-level Policy Strategies
Sanna-Riikka Saarela, Tarja Söderman, Jari Lyytimäki
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18682</guid>
<dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re-assessment of CO₂ and SO₂ emissions in energy sector by using LEAP-model</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18135</link>
<description>Re-assessment of CO₂ and SO₂ emissions in energy sector by using LEAP-model
Kuldna, Piret; Kuhi-Thalfeldt, Reeli; Peterson, Kaja
LIAISE Policy Brief No. 3 on "Re-assessment of CO₂ and SO₂ emissions in energy&#13;
sector by using LEAP-model: experiences from Estonian energy sector planning"&#13;
has just been published. The LEAP (Long-range Energy Alternatives Planning)&#13;
model is a software tool for energy policy analysis and climate change&#13;
mitigation assessment. In 2012, a re-assessment of LEAP modelling results on&#13;
CO2 and SO2 emissions in the Strategic Environmental Assessment of the&#13;
Estonian National Energy Sector Development Plan until 2020 (further referred&#13;
to as the Energy Plan 2020) was carried out. The aim of this re-assessment was&#13;
to find out to what extent the LEAP model results for the Energy Plan 2020&#13;
were achieved and what were the possible reasons for deviation. The results&#13;
highlight the opportunities for policy learning through the re-assessment of&#13;
modelling results and the need to find out how to include into Impact&#13;
Assessment the uncertainties that remain outside the scope of models.
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18135</guid>
<dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scientific Tools in Europe</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17982</link>
<description>Scientific Tools in Europe
Podhora, A.; Helming, K.; Adenäuer, Lucie; Heckelei, T.; Kautto, P.; Reidsma, P.; Rennings, K.; Turnpenny, J.; Jansen, J.
LIAISE Policy Brief No. 5 on "Scientific tools in Europe: focus and&#13;
application options" has just been published. Policy Impact Assessment (IA)&#13;
has been an obligatory procedure in the legislative process within the EU&#13;
since 2002. It has to identify the likely impacts on sustainable development&#13;
(specifically the social, environmental and economic impacts) of all major&#13;
policy strategies and instruments prior to actual implementation. The link&#13;
between IA and sustainable development is rooted in the 2006 renewed&#13;
Sustainable Development Strategy. IA also provides the legal basis to feed&#13;
scientific evidence into the policy process and to base policy-making on&#13;
scientifically robust tools and results. In line with the recognition of the&#13;
importance of IA for sound sustainable policies, the EC (DG Research and&#13;
Innovation) has funded through the Framework Programmes (FP) 6 and 7 research&#13;
supporting knowledge creation in this field. This policy brief presents an&#13;
analysis of tools developed in the context of FP6 and FP7 undertaken by the&#13;
LIAISE project. This assessment focused on the following interests of IA&#13;
practitioners as tool users: Which policy area(s) do the tools address? Which&#13;
impact area(s) are covered by the tools? Which jurisdictional level(s) can the&#13;
tools be applied at? How can the tools be categorized? There exists a wide&#13;
variety of tools that comprises: Quantitative and qualitative tools, such as&#13;
models, scenarios, multi-criteria analysis and participatory tools, Tool&#13;
components, such as indicators, databases and comprehensive analytic methods,&#13;
Evaluation frameworks, toolboxes and platforms etc. serving as a higher level&#13;
system for tool selection or tool linkage. These results are based on an&#13;
analysis of 203 research projects designing tools for IA funded in FP6 and 7.&#13;
The results shall contribute to addressing the science-policy interface of IA&#13;
by identifying possible challenges for tool users and tool suppliers with&#13;
respect to tool development and selection.
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17982</guid>
<dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>"Setting up Young Farmers" CAP Measure in Rural Areas of Greece</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18494</link>
<description>"Setting up Young Farmers" CAP Measure in Rural Areas of Greece
LIAISE Policy Brief No. 4 on "'Setting up young farmers' CAP measure in rural&#13;
areas of Greece" has just been published.The imbalanced allocation of age-&#13;
classes with high share of older farmers against younger ones, and the&#13;
difficult access of young and well trained farmers to the primary sector are&#13;
important factors that negatively affect the rural areas in most of the&#13;
European countries. 'Setting up young farmers' is a measure of the Common&#13;
Agricultural Policy (CAP) that tries to answer these problems. A Test Case&#13;
Study was set up in the context of the LIAISE project in order to measure the&#13;
direct and indirect impacts of 'Setting up young farmers' measure in rural&#13;
areas. Among the various models and tools that could be used to understand&#13;
Rural Development Programme (RDP) effects and measure its impacts, the&#13;
Multicriteria Decision Analysis approach was selected. We used this approach&#13;
to assess the impacts of the measure in rural areas (prefectures) of Northern&#13;
Greece, focusing on economic and social impacts. The results of the Test Case&#13;
highlight the importance of context-sensitive methods for generating and&#13;
disseminating knowledge taking into account local information needs. The&#13;
"Setting up young farmers" RDP measure was implemented in two programming&#13;
periods, 2000-2006 and 2007-2013 in the seven prefectures of the Region of&#13;
Central Macedonia in Northern Greece.
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18494</guid>
<dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
