<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19041">
<title>FFU-report Jahrgang 2012</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19041</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19988"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/22519"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20095"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20075"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T21:43:12Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19988">
<title>Approaching Rio + 20</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19988</link>
<description>Approaching Rio + 20
Bär, Holger; Jacob, Klaus; Werland, Stefan
This report presents findings from an online survey and a number of expert
interviews on the perspectives of European civil society on Sustainable
Development and the Green Economy in the run-up to the 2012 UN Conference on
Sustainable Development. The survey was sent out to civil society
organisations in six selected European countries to gain a bet-ter
understanding of their views on specific aspects of the Green Economy concept.
In ad-dition to this, the data analysis allows us to compare respondents’
answers across different groups of civil society as well as between countries.
The survey questions range from the definitional aspects of what the Green
Economy is and what its elements are to the conflict dimensions identified in
the first part of the study as well as the risks and opportunities seen in the
Green Economy. Finally, it includes the questions what role governments should
take and what policy and financing instruments should be used more widely in
the transition to the Green Economy. The Green Economy concept is still an
open concept and civil society groups are eager to weigh-in and help define
its boundaries and key aspects. With this lack of clarity come many concerns,
both internationally as well as on the European level, that the Green Economy
could be ‘just a greened capitalism’ that allows for ‘greenwashing’ and
‘social greenwashing’. A large majority of respondents say that the concept
should be based on a three-pillar ap-proach, while questions remain concerning
the extent of the social dimension of the Green Economy. Trade unions
emphasize the need for better working conditions and international standards,
for example by implementing social protection floors. This question in
particu-lar is connected to the European debate and the relationship between
the Europe 2020 strategy and its flagship initiative on resource efficiency,
and the European Sustainable Development Strategy (EUSDS). Unions and
environmental groups fear that the EUSDS might be replaced by the ‘narrower’
Europe 2020 strategy that, in their view, lacks a strong social dimension. The
social partners agree that the greening of the economy should be a consensus-
based approach that includes all sectors and rejects a view that distinguishes
between ‘brown’ and ‘green’ sectors of the economy. There are more diverse
views on the questions of what role governments should play and what
instruments they should use. Respondents agree that national governments
should provide framework conditions and economic incen-tives to businesses and
support research and development for green technologies. Beyond that, there is
still disagreement within civil society sectors along with significant differ-
ences in the member states over what instruments should or should not be used.
Similarly, there are differences regarding the question of how much the
government should get in-volved in the development of the economy and if there
should be an active de-growth of certain polluting sectors. What respondents
generally seem to agree on is that the European Economic and Social Committee
can and should play a significant role in providing a forum to bring European
civil society together and build consensus, to help civil society’s views be
heard in EU poli-cymaking and to work to ensure the EU acts as a role model in
the transition to a Green Economy. This report aims to make a contribution to
this endeavour.
</description>
<dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/22519">
<title>Old powers, old paths, emerging participation? Irrigation Management in post-
Soviet Azerbaijan</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/22519</link>
<description>Old powers, old paths, emerging participation? Irrigation Management in post-
Soviet Azerbaijan
Fox, Svenja
The objective of this study is to identify factors determining the performance
of natural resource management by local users in a post-Soviet context, using
the case of irrigation in Azerbaijan. By examining the activity of six water
user associations and assessing the role played by the local environment in
their success or failure, this study aims to contribute to a better
understanding of constraints on modern irrigation management in a post-Soviet
context. The study explores external variables for WUA performance in post-
Soviet Azerbaijan. The research draws on theoretical insight from both
collective action theory and historical institutionalism. In a first step, I
ask the question of “How do water user associations in Azerbaijan perform? Are
we looking at a 'story of success' or at a 'story of failure?” In a second
step, the main research question - “How do external factors influence the
performance of water user associations in Azerbaijan?” - is answered by
applying a methodological framework to qualitative interview data generated in
expert interviews. The results confirm the findings of previous studies that
the post-Soviet context presents particular challenges to participatory
irrigation management. Whereas the broader legal and policy environment seems
to be favorable for WUA establishment, both formal and informal Soviet
legacies can be identified as impeding factors. Old powers still prove to be
in place, old paths still seem to play a role, and the emergence of farmer
participation is slow and challenged by a number of constraints.
</description>
<dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20095">
<title>Synopse aktuell diskutierter Wohlfahrtsansätze und grüner Wachstumskonzepte</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20095</link>
<description>Synopse aktuell diskutierter Wohlfahrtsansätze und grüner Wachstumskonzepte
Meyer, Bernd; Diefenbacher, Hans; Zieschank, Roland; Ahlert, Gerd
</description>
<dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20075">
<title>The National Welfare Index as a contribution to the debate on a more
sustainable economy</title>
<link>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20075</link>
<description>The National Welfare Index as a contribution to the debate on a more
sustainable economy
Zieschank, Roland; Diefenbacher, Hans
The task of reaching a more sustainable kind of economic process is narrowly
related with a double problem: up to date most societies have pursued an
explicit strategy of economic growth, although its successes are now
disappearing and, at a closer look, its negative ecological and social side
effects appear to be even growing. The first part of this article contrasts
the ambiguity of the growth concept with a concept of social welfare, which
aims at a more qualitative kind of growth, considering the available natural
and social capital as well. It will become clear that even GDP as a
traditional and politically crucial indicator for the success or failure of a
country’s economic development necessarily gives ambiguous signals if one
looks at this parameter of the national accounts by the light of a sustainable
development. More recent calculations of the national welfare index for
Germany (NWI) result in some interesting discussion lines: the aggregated
progress of 19 variables shows an significant difference in its development:
between 2000 and 2007, the NWI tends to fall in comparison with GDP/GNI (gross
national income). This discrepancy is to be seen as evidence of the fact that
there might be an increasing economic growth even without any improvement in
welfare. Quite on the contrary, in the years 2008 – 2009 the NWI does not seem
to follow the drastic collapse of GDP/GNI at the same pace. This article aims
at providing an overview both of the social context in which NWI was created
as a complementary reporting system integrating GDP/GNI and of its
construction principles as well as of some results. From all this, some
conclusions will be drawn about how the index can be helpful in the
development of a more sustainable concept of welfare. For example, it will
become understandable that improvements in welfare can be achieved even
without economic growth. This process could go hand in hand with reflections
on economic transformation and cultural change. It is all about future
strategies allowing a reduction in the physical material and energy flux as
well as in the negative impacts on ecosystems and nature due to economic
activities, so that societies will profit from such change.
</description>
<dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
