<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Diskussionsbeiträge Jahrgang 2015</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18845" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18845</id>
<updated>2026-04-28T20:10:54Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T20:10:54Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Capitalization of capital gains taxes</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19885" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Eichfelder, Sebastian</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Lau, Mona</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19885</id>
<updated>2020-01-31T16:27:10Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Capitalization of capital gains taxes
Eichfelder, Sebastian; Lau, Mona
We argue that the tax capitalization effect is a function of the attention of
market participants. Market reactions can therefore be driven not only by the
announcement dates of tax events but also by factors influencing the
dissemination of tax information, such as deadlines and media reports.
Analyzing the introduction date of the earlier-announced German capital gains
tax reform of 2009 by triple-difference estimation, we find evidence of a
delayed market reaction long after the announcement date. Within the last two
(five) trading days before the deadline, we observe a sharp increase in
abnormal trading volumes of 151.7% (104.0%). The aggregate abnormal return of
the German capital market in the last five trading days in 2008 was 10.6%.
Furthermore, we find a significant and positive correlation between trading
volumes and measures for awareness of the upcoming tax reform (Google searches
and media reports).
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Charitable giving and its persistent and transitory reactions to changes in
tax incentives</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19837" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bönke, Timm</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Werdt, Clive</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19837</id>
<updated>2021-08-19T06:02:12Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Charitable giving and its persistent and transitory reactions to changes in
tax incentives
Bönke, Timm; Werdt, Clive
We estimate the elasticity of charitable giving with respect to price and
income changes using a rich panel of income tax returns covering the period
2001 to 2006. Employing censored quantile regression and exploiting the panel
structure, the advantage of our analysis is twofold: First, we derive results
for different points in the underlying distribution of charitable giving and
allow for giving to be heterogeneous. Thus, we do not only estimate responses
of giving to prices and incomes but also where the incentives matter most.
Second, we disentangle long-run responses to persistent changes in price and
income from temporary reactions, consumption smoothing, or tax planning.
Indeed, our results suggest that price elasticity is heterogenous across the
distribution of donors and that the persistent price elasticity is close to
one in absolute value at the upper and lower tail of the distribution of
charitable giving.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Congestion pricing</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20061" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Heller, C.-Philipp</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Johnen, Johannes</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Schmitz, Sebastian</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20061</id>
<updated>2021-08-19T06:01:56Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Congestion pricing
Heller, C.-Philipp; Johnen, Johannes; Schmitz, Sebastian
We study road congestion as a mechanism design problem. In our basic model we
analyze the allocation of a set of drivers among two roads, one of which may
be congested. An additional driver on the congestible road imposes an
externality on the other drivers by increasing their travel time. Each driver
is privately informed about her value of time and asked to report that value
to the mechanism designer, who assigns drivers to roads. With a finite number
of drivers, there is aggregate uncertainty and the efficient allocation is ex
ante unknown. Setting a single Pigouvian price is then not optimal. However,
the efficient allocation is implementable by a Vickrey-Clarke-Groves price
schedule that lets each driver pay the externality she imposes on other
drivers. This allows drivers to pay to have other drivers use the slow road
instead of the congestible road. As the number of drivers becomes large, there
is a single optimal Pigouvian price that leads to an efficient allocation.
However, finding this price requires the mechanism designer to either know the
precise distribution of the value of time or the use of our mechanism. We
analyze some extensions and apply our model to various congestion problems
arising in other contexts.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Distributional Effects of Subsidizing Retirement Savings Accounts</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20082" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Corneo, Giacomo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Schröder, Carsten</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>König, Johannes</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20082</id>
<updated>2021-08-19T06:02:29Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Distributional Effects of Subsidizing Retirement Savings Accounts
Corneo, Giacomo; Schröder, Carsten; König, Johannes
We empirically investigate the distributional consequences of the Riester
scheme, the main private pension subsidization program in Germany. We find
that 38% of the aggregate subsidy accrues to the top two deciles of the
population, but only 7.3% to the bottom two. Nonetheless the Riester scheme is
almost distributionally neutral when looking at standard inequality measures.
This is due to two offsetting effects: a progressive one stemming from the
subsidy schedule and a regressive one from voluntary participation.
Regressions of the participation decision suggest that a high level of
household wealth significantly increases the probability of benefiting from
the Riester scheme.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
