<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Working Paper Series / desiguALdades.net 2016</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18091" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18091</id>
<updated>2026-04-28T15:30:56Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T15:30:56Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Desigualdades no uso corporal dos espaços públicos urbanos na América Latina</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19818" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Frehse, Fraya</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19818</id>
<updated>2020-01-31T16:28:09Z</updated>
<published>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Desigualdades no uso corporal dos espaços públicos urbanos na América Latina
Frehse, Fraya
Social science research on social inequality in Latin America emphasizes the
role that residential distribution of social groups in urban space plays in
the production and/or reproduction of asymmetries of social positioning there
in conjunction with the acceleration of economic globalization in the 1990s.
Meanwhile, spaces absolutely receptive to social diversity, such as public
streets and squares in Latin American historical centers during the shop
opening hours, are less studied. This paper presents the analysis of a
Brazilian case, São Paulo’s cathedral square, where I gathered ethnographic
data on 39 occasions (Monday and Friday afternoons) in 2013. Applying
particular dialectical and phenomenological perspectives, a Lefebvrean and
Goffmanian one, I aim to answer how and why the bodily use pedestrians made of
this place may interfere in the (re)production of social equality in São Paulo
at this point in time. From this research, secular body-behavioral and moral
inequalities emerge as important issues.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Developmentalism at the Periphery</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/22044" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Fritz, Barbara</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Paula, Luiz Fernando de</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Prates, Daniela M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/22044</id>
<updated>2025-03-24T10:48:44Z</updated>
<published>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Developmentalism at the Periphery
Fritz, Barbara; Paula, Luiz Fernando de; Prates, Daniela M.
The 2000s have brought a renewed debate on strategies of ‘developmentalism’ in&#13;
emerging market economies, especially in Latin America. We consider new&#13;
concepts of developmentalism to be strategies in which the state deliberately&#13;
pushes the process of development, in terms of structural change, and aims at&#13;
income redistribution. In our paper, we seek to systematize this debate,&#13;
comparing the concepts of new developmentalism and social developmentalism. We&#13;
argue that of particular relevance for this discussion are the policy space&#13;
constraints for emerging market economies imposed by international monetary&#13;
and financial asymmetries. We conclude that the latter of the two approaches&#13;
does not consider appropriately the policy constraints related to these&#13;
asymmetries, which reduce the space for the implementation of developmentalist&#13;
policies, while the former sees redistribution as a mere result of export-led&#13;
industrialization.
</summary>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>How Social Developmentalism Reframed Social Policy in Brazil</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19963" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lavinas, Lena</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19963</id>
<updated>2020-01-31T16:28:09Z</updated>
<published>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">How Social Developmentalism Reframed Social Policy in Brazil
Lavinas, Lena
How Social Developmentalism Reframed Social Policy in Brazil Lena Lavinas
Abstract This paper proposes to critically situate the social-developmentalist
current of the last decade within the broader moment of finance-dominated
accumulation regime, wherein, crucially, credit and access to financial
markets have become the core motifs for the new mass-consumption market
society. This structural move is, from our point of view, radically distinct
from the very framework which inspired the tenets of early structuralist
thought and which prevailed during the Keynesian post-war period. Today,
highly segmented credit loans, private insurance, and other new financial
products such as payment protection insurance have synthesized into
indispensable elements for growth. In this new financialized framework, social
policy has been used to underwrite a financial inclusion model that sowed the
seeds of its own demise—while it enabled Brazil’s transition into a society of
mass consumption, it also deepened the indebtedness of households, partially
transforming social insurance and welfare benefits into financial rents.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>In the Shadow of the Neoliberal Reforms</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/22039" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Torre, Juan Carlos</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/22039</id>
<updated>2020-01-31T16:28:09Z</updated>
<published>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">In the Shadow of the Neoliberal Reforms
Torre, Juan Carlos
For many years social studies classified the mobilization of the unemployed as
a highly unlikely phenomenon; it was argued that the loss of jobs generates
individual apathy, resignation and impotence. In the last twenty years, this
conclusion has been the object of substantial revision. The reason is well
known: the rebellion of the unemployed has become a reality in many countries,
as it was the case in Argentina in recent years. This unexpected development
had roots in the specific development of the country’s economy and society in
the post-World War Two era. In the context of the neoliberal reforms in the
1990s, and their aftermath, the emergence of this movement had tremendous
consequences for social equality, even today. This paper presents the specific
factors which gave rise to this movement, its peak, and subsequent decline.
Throughout, the focus is on the consequence for inequality among workers and
in society.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
