<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Diskussionsbeiträge Jahrgang 2003</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17935" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17935</id>
<updated>2026-04-30T18:01:52Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-30T18:01:52Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Against rigid rules - Keynes's economic theory</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20196" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Muchlinski, Elke</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/20196</id>
<updated>2021-08-27T11:10:39Z</updated>
<published>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Against rigid rules - Keynes's economic theory
Muchlinski, Elke
This paper provides textual evidence of Keynes's position on monetary policy&#13;
and shaping international monetary relations. One result of my contribution is&#13;
that the famous dichotomy "rules versus discretion" is of no relevance to his&#13;
economic theory, because he used the term "rules" not in the meaning of a&#13;
formal brilliantly designed notion.He definitely made a distinction between&#13;
non-rigidly-fixed-rules and discretion. I give an explanation why his economic&#13;
theory is not compatible with principles of constructivism, empiricism and&#13;
ontological realism by referring to a key term of his economic writings, i.e.,&#13;
discretionary decision.
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Arbeitsmarktpolitik und ökonomische Theorie - zur Degenerierung einer&#13;
Forschungspraxis</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19622" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Riese, Hajo</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19622</id>
<updated>2021-08-27T11:00:31Z</updated>
<published>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Arbeitsmarktpolitik und ökonomische Theorie - zur Degenerierung einer&#13;
Forschungspraxis
Riese, Hajo
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The End of Stability and Growth Pact?</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19705" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Haan, Jakob de</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Berger, Helge</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Jansen, David-Jan</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19705</id>
<updated>2025-11-17T07:29:19Z</updated>
<published>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The End of Stability and Growth Pact?
Haan, Jakob de; Berger, Helge; Jansen, David-Jan
This paper evaluates the Stability and Growth Pact. After examining the rules&#13;
in place and the experience so far, the Pact is analysed from a political&#13;
economy perspective, focusing on the choice for so-called soft law and drawing&#13;
inferences from characteristics of successful fiscal rules at the state level&#13;
in the United States. It is also examined whether big and small countries are&#13;
likely to adhere to fiscal policy rules in place. Furthermore, the impact of&#13;
the business cycle on fiscal policy outcomes is analysed. Finally, the&#13;
proposals of the European Commission to strengthen the Pact are discussed.
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
