<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>LIAISE Working Paper</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17632" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17632</id>
<updated>2026-04-29T14:00:00Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T14:00:00Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Approaching Rio + 20</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18593" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bär, Holger</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Jacob, Klaus</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Werland, Stefan</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18593</id>
<updated>2020-01-31T16:29:22Z</updated>
<published>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Approaching Rio + 20
Bär, Holger; Jacob, Klaus; Werland, Stefan
This report presents findings from an online survey and a number of expert
interviews on the perspectives of European civil society on Sustainable
Development and the Green Economy in the run-up to the 2012 UN Conference on
Sustainable Development. The survey was sent out to civil society
organisations in six selected European countries to gain a better
understanding of their views on specific aspects of the Green Economy concept.
In addition to this, the data analysis allows the authors to compare
respondents’ answers across different groups of civil society as well as
between countries. The survey questions range from the definitional aspects of
what the Green Economy is and what its elements are to the conflict dimensions
identified in the first part of the study as well as the risks and
opportunities seen in the Green Economy. Finally, it includes the questions
what role governments should take and what policy and financing instruments
should be used more widely in the transition to the Green Economy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Assessing the economic impacts of climate change</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19207" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bosello, Francesco</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Eboli, Fabio</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Pierfederici, Roberta</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19207</id>
<updated>2020-01-31T16:45:04Z</updated>
<published>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Assessing the economic impacts of climate change
Bosello, Francesco; Eboli, Fabio; Pierfederici, Roberta
The present research describes a climate change integrated impact assessment&#13;
exercise, whose economic evaluation is based on a CGE approach and modeling&#13;
effort. Input to the CGE model comes from a wide although still partial set of&#13;
up-to-date bottom-up impact studies. Estimates indicate that a temperature&#13;
increase of 1.92°C compared to pre-industrial levels in 2050 could lead to&#13;
global GDP losses of approximately 0.5% compared to a hypothetical scenario&#13;
where no climate change is assumed to occur. Northern Europe is expected to&#13;
benefit from the evaluated temperature increase (+0.18%), while Southern and&#13;
Eastern Europe are expected to suffer from the climate change scenario under&#13;
analysis (-0.15% and -0.21% respectively). Most vulnerable countries are the&#13;
less developed regions, such as South Asia, South-East Asia, North Africa and&#13;
Sub-Saharan Africa. In these regions the most exposed sector is agriculture,&#13;
and the impact on crop productivity is by far the most important source of&#13;
damages. It is worth noting that the general equilibrium estimates tend to be&#13;
lower, in absolute terms, than the bottom-up, partial equilibrium estimates.&#13;
The difference is to be attributed to the effect of market-driven adaptation.&#13;
This partly reduces the direct impacts of temperature increases, leading to&#13;
lower damage estimates. Nonetheless these remain positive and substantive in&#13;
some regions. Accordingly, market-driven adaptation cannot be the solution to&#13;
the climate change problem.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Dynamic Market Power in an Exhaustible Resource Industry</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19138" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Pothen, Frank</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/19138</id>
<updated>2020-01-31T16:29:23Z</updated>
<published>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Dynamic Market Power in an Exhaustible Resource Industry
Pothen, Frank
</summary>
<dc:date>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Green economy discourses in the Run-Up to Rio 2012</title>
<link href="https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18852" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bär, Holger</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Jacob, Klaus</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Werland, Stefan</name>
</author>
<id>https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/18852</id>
<updated>2020-01-31T16:29:23Z</updated>
<published>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Green economy discourses in the Run-Up to Rio 2012
Bär, Holger; Jacob, Klaus; Werland, Stefan
The study analyses central contributions to the debate on the concept of a
Green Economy in the run-up to the 2012 United Nations Conference on
Sustainable Development. It does so by identifying the pillars on which the
various understandings of a green economy are based as well as analysing
policy concepts published and statements made. It concludes that currently
there are three distinguishable discourses on the green economy and that the
political challenge for the Rio+20 conference will lie in building bridges
between these different understanding to build a consensus. A central role for
the EESC is seen in supporting the EU’s role as a role model and helping to
build the bridges and adapt the concept in other countries.
</summary>
<dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
