id,collection,dc.contributor.author,dc.date.accessioned,dc.date.available,dc.date.issued,dc.description.abstract[en],dc.format.extent,dc.identifier.uri,dc.language,dc.rights.uri,dc.subject.ddc,dc.subject[en],dc.title,dc.type,dcterms.accessRights.openaire,dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber,dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi,dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle,dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number,dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url,dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume,dcterms.isPartOf.eissn,refubium.affiliation,refubium.affiliation.other,refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub,refubium.resourceType.provider "8408dd5c-2d6f-462c-a65f-facd80fcbe7e","fub188/16","Lund-Hansen, Katrine K.||Kutzer, Megan A. M.||Armitage, Sophie A. O.||Gornard, Samuel||Keilani, Hamilcar||Abbott, Jessica K.","2022-09-19T07:25:40Z","2022-09-19T07:25:40Z","2022","Sexual dimorphism in somatic investment may be shaped by two distinct forms of sexual conflict; under intralocus sexual conflict (IASC), males and females have different optimal levels of somatic investment but are constrained from reaching their respective optima by their shared genome, while under interlocus sexual conflict (IRSC), males and females have different optimal sexual strategies, which could have direct or indirect effects on levels of somatic investment. We investigated effects of IASC and IRSC on two aspects of somatic investment, immune defence strategies and longevity, using previously established female-limited experimental evolution lines in Drosophila melanogaster. We found little evidence for any effect of either type of sexual conflict on investment in the immune defence resistance or tolerance. Nor did we find convincing evidence that longevity is subject to IASC in this species. However, we did find evidence that increased female control over mating rate had important and opposite effects on longevity between the sexes. Specifically, females that had adapted to high levels of female control over mating had a longer lifespan when kept in mixed-sex groups, while males had shorter longevity, perhaps due to increased investment in post-copulatory sexual selection. These novel results show that female control over mating rates may have important and unexpected effects on patterns of somatic investment.","10 Seiten","https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36353||http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-36069","eng","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie","Resistance||Tolerance||Drosophila melanogaster||Sexual antagonism||Experimental evolution||Longevity","Female-limited X chromosome evolution reveals that lifespan is mainly modulated by interlocus rather than intralocus sexual conflict","Wissenschaftlicher Artikel","open access","120","10.1007/s00265-022-03231-4","Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","9","https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03231-4","76","1432-0762","Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie","Institut für Biologie:::77195c3c-c355-4e73-837e-d2e0ba8b6c51:::600","no","WoS-Alert"