id,collection,dc.contributor.author,dc.date.accessioned,dc.date.available,dc.date.issued,dc.description.abstract[en],dc.identifier.uri,dc.language,dc.rights.uri,dc.subject.ddc,dc.subject[en],dc.title,dc.type,dcterms.accessRights.openaire,dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber,dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi,dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle,dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername,dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid,dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume,dcterms.isPartOf.eissn,refubium.affiliation,refubium.funding,refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub "097e5752-9411-466c-b6e3-cb403df0696a","fub188/15","Choi, Mira||Bachmann, Friederike||Wu, Kaiyin||Lachmann, Nils||Schmidt, Danilo||Brakemeier, Susanne||Duerr, Michael||Kahl, Andreas||Eckardt, Kai-Uwe||Budde, Klemens||Nickel, Peter","2022-05-03T10:52:05Z","2022-05-03T10:52:05Z","2020","Background: In de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTR) treatment with belatacept has been established as a comparable option as maintenance immunosuppression, preferably as a strategy to convert from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)- to belatacept-based immunosuppression. Switch to belatacept demonstrated improved renal function in patients with CNI-induced nephrotoxicity, but risk of transplant rejection and the development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are still a matter of debate. Only few data are available in patients at increased immunological risk and late after transplantation. Methods: We analyzed 30 long-term KTR (including 2 combined pancreas-KTR) converted from CNI to belatacept > 60 months after transplantation with moderate to severe graft dysfunction (GFR ≤ 45 mL/min). Biopsies were classified according to the Banff 2015 criteria. Group differences were assessed in a univariate analysis using Mann Whitney U or Chi square test, respectively. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for treatment failure was performed using a binary logistic regression model including significant predictors from univariate analysis. Fifty-six KTR matched for donor and recipient characteristics were used as a control cohort remaining under CNI-treatment. Results: Patient survival in belatacept cohort at 12/24 months was 96.7%/90%, overall graft survival was 76.7 and 60.0%, while graft survival censored for death was 79.3%/66.7%. In patients with functioning grafts, median GFR improved from 22.5 mL/min to 24.5 mL/min at 24 months. Positivity for DSA at conversion was 46.7%. From univariate analysis of risk factors for graft loss, GFR < 25 mL/min (p = 0.042) and Banff microvascular inflammation (MVI) sum score ≥ 2 (p = 0.023) at conversion were significant at 24 months. In the analysis of risk factors for treatment failure, a MVI sum score ≥ 2 was significant univariately (p = 0.023) and in a bivariate (p = 0.037) logistic regression at 12 months. DSA-positivity was neither associated with graft loss nor treatment failure. The control cohort had comparable graft survival outcomes at 24 months, albeit without increase of mean GFR in patients with functioning grafts (ΔGFR of - 3.6 ± 8.5 mL/min). Conclusion: Rescue therapy with conversion to belatacept is feasible in patients with worsening renal function, even many years after transplantation. The benefit in patients with MVI and severe GFR impairment remains to be investigated.","https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/34933||http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-34651","eng","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit","Belatacept||Allograft failure||Kidney transplantation||Calcineurin inhibitor toxicity","Microvascular inflammation is a risk factor in kidney transplant recipients with very late conversion from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to belatacept","Wissenschaftlicher Artikel","open access","354","10.1186/s12882-020-01992-6","BMC Nephrology","Springer Nature","32819287","21","1471-2369","Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin","Springer Nature DEAL","no"